One of the most shocking revelations of the documentary series ‘Controlling Britney Spears’, produced by The New York Times to give a good account of the most controversial and lurid details of the judicial protection that the princess of the pop for 13 years, referred to the techniques that Jamie Spears, father of the singer, would have used to have her watched and controlled at all times.
The most striking of them involved the alleged installation of tiny microphones in the singer’s bedroom, with which Jamie would have spied on the diva to anticipate any attempt to violate the rules, which were shown to be abusive, disproportionate and harmful to their fundamental rights.
This illustrative story could be false, or so the artist’s father has assured in an affidavit and sent to the Superior Court of Los Angeles , which has been echoed by the newspaper Th and New York Post.
“I am aware of that accusation… That he had installed microphones in her room to monitor her during her guardianship. That statement is false“, reads an excerpt from the text.
“I have never carried out or authorized any espionage exercise in my daughter’s bedroom, nor during guardianship time or at any other time”
Jamie Spears
“I am not aware that something similar could have happened. If I had to testify before a judge, I could safely say that what I have stated is true and correct“, Jamie Spears has defended herself.
The aforementioned New York Times program, which premiered At the end of last year, he collected the startling testimony of a former employee of the security firm Black Box Security, named Alex Vlasov.
This expert maintained that he had been hired by Jamie Spears to “protect” the interpreter, in words from Britney’s controversial father, which ultimately led to allegedly over 180 hours of recordings coming from her bedroom, as well as extensive and potentially criminal monitoring of your mobile phone.