We have spoken, for now, with several of the celebrities confirmed by Telemundo for the fourth season of “La Casa de los Famosos”, and we have realized that many understand the concept and dynamics of this reality show, but few understand the situations. who will live inside the house and the effect that they have on the way human beings – them – react and perceive reality in circumstances like these.
This is the fourth season that Telemundo presents and during all the previous editions we have been able to talk with the celebrities chosen for the project. We have spoken with them both before they enter the reality show and when they leave it, either by elimination or as winners of the $200,000 dollars. And everyone, equally, lives the same experience once they connect with reality and encounter the love or rejection of the viewing public: surprise and disbelief.
The problem within the show is that everyone believes they are on the right side, due to the evaluations they make of the environment based on their own moral assessments. But making errors in judgment is the most common thing within this project, this is how we have seen that the great “villains” of this reality show lose everything: Niurka Marcos, Gaby Spanic, Cristina Eustace, Celia Lora, Laura Bozzo, Daniela Navarro, Salvador Zerboni, Paty Navidad, Dania Méndez, La Materialista, Arturo Carmona, among others.
So what’s the trick?
Before continuing and explaining where the trick is, we have to ask ourselves this question: What have all the celebrities who have earned the “hate” and “rejection” of the public within this project had in common? Easy: everyone has believed they are absolutely right, ensuring that they are the ones on the right side, that they are the good ones and that they know more than the rest because they perceive reality better, this is the first big mistake that everyone makes.
In this project, everyone who enters must understand that in principle they know nothing and that the only moment in which they will truly understand or know if they are on the “good side of the force” is by accepting the decisions of the public. Celebrities must understand that they know nothing, that the only one who “knows everything” is the public. Why? Because only they know who is lying and who is not. Because the public sees everything 24/7 and has access, obviously, to all the conversations of each side and famous people alike.
Fans who follow “La Casa de los Famosos” and vote to ensure the permanence of their favorite are usually not ambiguous. Whether or not they support their celebrity with their vote and reward whoever they know deserves to stay in the game.
The house of “La Jefa” – its inhabitants – may consider that the nominee is “bad” and that he deserves to leave the reality show, either because they consider that he does not clean, because they call him “furniture” or that he does not provide content and because even They believe that they “play the victim”, but if the public returns it with their votes, again and again, they must understand that the public is in charge and that they know something that the inhabitants do not. They must then accept that they are making a mistake. This is an exercise in humility that few if any have known how to perform.
This is the trick of La Casa de los Famosos and to this day this is what the celebrities who accept Telemundo’s challenge have not yet been able to understand.
Examples…
- In the third season, Madison Anderson was nominated almost eight times and on all of them the public returned her home. It was evident that by nominating her consecutively they achieved two things, the first and most obvious of which was her losing a vote and the second of strengthening the public’s favoritism. That is, they made sure to make her a winner and automatically became villains of the story themselves.
- Ivonne Montero, during the second season, was branded by the house as the famous one who “played the victim” to reach the final, Toni Costa himself lost his chance to win when he followed in the footsteps of Daniella Navarro and Nacho Casano, in against the Mexican actress. They managed to nominate her in front of strong people within the show and even then they could not understand the power that she had when the public returned her to the house, not even she herself knew what was happening outside of her. They couldn’t even understand that Daniella’s elimination days before the final was a clear indication that the public preferred Montero.
- Salvador Zerboni, yes, he may be the “favorite villain” but finishing second is not winning. Her mistake was always speaking badly of Ivonne Montero, defending her and then always attacking her, assuring that she was the bad one. His doublespeak earned him third place. Because even when people connected with his way of being away from the drama, these arguments with double standards led him to lose and not win.
The case of “La Materialista” and Toni Costa
You can reach the final in many ways and “La Materialista” verified that another way to know how to get there is by maintaining peace -apparent- within the house and thus ensuring that no one nominates her. But the public outside had another idea. On several occasions they wanted to eliminate her but she was not nominated. Therefore, this card sometimes helps you reach the final, but it does not necessarily help you win the grand prize.
Toni Costa went through the same thing. He received only one nomination and then continued walking quietly towards the final, but the public knew everything he had done and everything he had said. The viewer forgot and/or forgave much of this. But his biggest mistake was turning his back on Ivonne Montero, this secured the Spaniard fourth place in the second season in which Montero won. If he had teamed up with Ivonne he could have taken second place or even he could have won this season.
After all the above, the question arises: at what price do you want to reach the final? Many have been among the five or four finalists, but not all have arrived with the affection of the public at a global level. Many today continue to receive “hate” for everything they did within this reality show and although many believe that the public forgives and forgets, this is not entirely true.
What does the public reward?
The public does appreciate that celebrities “make content”, but not necessarily at all costs. This is where actors and content creators have to be smart and show that they really understand what audiences want to see.
Viewers accept that there are celebrities who want to be impartial and play alone, but they respect this position only when the person goes straight as Pepe Gámez did. Yes, inside the house the celebrities didn’t know what to expect from him, but he made sure that the public always knew everything.
This is the key to playing this role, because Pepe always went up front with the public and in the same way with the rest of the celebrities by showing them that he had no side and that he had no problem being nominated for this decision. This is what made Pepe different from Toni Costa in front of the public. And that is why, although Pepe and Toni reached the final, one did so in third place and the other in fourth position, the public’s appreciation also means that in this comparison the Mexican actor always emerges victorious over the role that Costa played. within the reality show.
Continue reading more from Telemundo’s La Casa de los Famosos here:
· La Casa de los Famosos 4 confirms Maripily Rivera: “Boricua in the house!”, says the public
· José Reyes will enter La Casa de los Famosos 4: Telemundo confirms the arrival of “La Melaza”
· La Casa de los Famosos 4: La Divaza joins the new season of the Telemundo reality show