paulo-quevedo-stars-in-discussion-with-melaza-in-'la-casa-de-los-famosos-4'Paulo Quevedo stars in discussion with Melaza in 'La Casa de los Famosos 4'
Julio Blanca's Avatar

By Julio Blanca

Mar 31, 2024, 3:12 PM EDT

The Mexican actor Paulo Quevedo arrived at ‘La Casa de los Famosos 4’ a few days ago and has already starred in several controversial situations within the reality show on the Telemundo network.

This Saturday night, for example, he had an argument with the former baseball player known as La Melaza.

It all originated because the Dominican told the new inhabitant that he had heard that he was going against the fourth Earth and that he would also try to conquer the Colombian model Ariadna Gutiérrez.

However, this upset the famous person, who said that his words were distorted. “I didn’t say that I was going after Ariadna, dude, nothing else needs to be clarified because if I have told Lupillo anything, it is that we have to play and not get on our mother’s throats in a dirty way.”

In this sense, he added: “Nothing more, that is the only thing I ask for, with all due respect.”

For his part, Melaza was quite serious and told him: “I haven’t changed anything, she just told him.” Furthermore, he indicated that he had heard that he was also going against the fourth Water, something that causes confusion because he feels that he is not being sincere.

Aleska Génesis also intervened and stated: “What I want is to clarify this issue because something bigger can come out of this without need.”

The situation escalated and Paulo Quevedo continued confronting Melaza: “Don’t turn things around. I didn’t say I was going after Achilles’ heel. “I’m not going to give it to someone who doesn’t have the balls to say things.”

The Dominican asked him what he meant and the actor continued: “Look, brother, learn a little, he (Lupillo) and I speak to each other in the eyes, directly and with respect. If you don’t have the balls to say what I said there, then the problem is you.”

After this, the ‘Toro del Corrido’ intervened and said: “But Pablo, something was said in another way.”

The artist’s response was again against Molasses, since he considers that he distorted everything and caused this difference to be generated.

By Scribe